Planning New Inclusive Cities using Smart Tech and Artificial Intelligence

Ulrich Graute • 19 October 2024

Report on the Urban Conversation on Ethical Use of AI in Urban Planning at the 60th World Planning Congress in Siena, Italy on 11 OCTOBER 2024

The Future of Cities – AI as friend or Foe for Cities !

There are different entry points to deal with Artificial Intelligence (AI) depending weather you are an AI researcher, an IT programmer, code developer, an investor etc. At the 60th World Planning Congress of the International Society of City and Regional Planners ISOCARP on 8-12 October in Siena, Italy, urban and regional planners, academics and practitioners gathered for an Urban Conversation to discuss opportunities and threats related to new innovations like AI.

The panel speakers, thought leaders and critical thinkers in the conference room approached AI with the perspective of planners and city makers. The guiding question was formulated by Keynote Speaker Dr. Sarah Hill, the former CEO of the Greater Sydney Commission (GSC) and Western Parkland City Authority (WPCA, NSW Govt Australia) and Executive Project Director (PIF, Saudi Arabia): In adapting one of Jan Gehl’s famous city quotes – that whilst we may well shape our cities and they in turn shape us, she asked: “What shape will AI have on future cities and the ethics of those who plan them?”

Dr. Sunil Dubey of UNSW Cities Institute, Australia established underlying innovation links from ancient cities to modern day city making in countries like Australia and Saudi Arabia. He demonstrated how (innovative) language was always a key to human life and city development from the Cuneiform (31st Century BC to 2nd Century AC) at the ancient city of Nimrud to the binary code of our computers and now to the Large Language Models used in AI. Language is the basis for Community, Creativity and Innovation as they are at the core of the New City -Bradfield Western Sydney Aerotropolis in Australia. Sunil’s presentation was important. Not that it diminished risks and the call for attention with respect to innovation and AI but it framed future AI development and use as part of an ongoing cultural and societal development which reaches thousands of years back. In doing so he took a strong position regarding the important role of cities for sustainable development. For instance, he quoted his mentor and the former Secretary General of United Cities and Local Governments UCLG Joseph Roig: ‘the future path for global peace & prosperity must go through Cities. The transition from Nationhood to Cities is challenging due to competing power pressures but global peace & prosperity will not be established without Cities Leading the charge.’

The important technical innovation through AI was not at the center of the Urban Conversation. However, Dr. Ulrich Graute quoted in his introduction goals and concerns coming from AI researchers, including Stuart Russel of the University of Berkeley, California.

Important is Russel’s indication that he is ‘fairly confident that we have some breathing space because there are several major breakthroughs needed between here and superintelligence’ which is confirmed by other AI researchers. There are so many insecurities regarding AI that the IMF recommends governments to prepare for both, massive disruption, in the case that AI should impact an estimated 40 percent of global employment, and for business as usual in case that the current AI hype should pass and just leave some technical tools as earlier innovation waves did. It is also too early to answer the guiding questions of the Urban Conversation on the impact AI will have on the future of cities. However, panellists concurred that AI is an important new subject for urban and regional planning and for cooperation within ISOCARP to lead the Global Dialogues on AI in Future Cities.

Sunil presented a strong case with Innovation examples on Riyadh leading the Urban Innovation AI campaign for the Middle Est Region in promoting Peace, Progress & Prosperity through capacity building and City Leadership campaigns led by Mayor Dr Faisal. He further pursued the role of Riyadh in leading the ISOCARP Innovation and AI global campaigns and establishing AI focused City Leadership Lab in collaboration with global institutions like IMF, World Bank and WEF. It is time to act now and to ensure we are on a socially beneficial path with AI in cities, we must start with a broader discussion, encompassing many more stakeholders than just the most powerful tech leaders, on what we can achieve with these new tools and what we want from them.

As an Urban Conversation (in contrast to a general dialogue on AI) it was important that Sarah Hill in the first part of her keynote presented some context to the case of Bradfield, why Australia is building a new city and the aim to enhance social equity and inclusion across Greater Sydney. In the second part she focused on how she and her team are using smart technology to help achieve these objectives. The third part of her speech provided commentary on the role AI could play, perhaps should play and certainly should not play in planning new cities and community infrastructure. In her current role she and her team are pushing AIs design capability even further to help ideate what our cities could deliver with unique building design. Equally they are testing the practical function and Their masterplans and what outcomes they could achieve.

Sarah Hill has no doubt that AI will bring a transformative force – but the question is whether we can harness this force for good and ultimately whether the change will have positive or negative consequences to social inclusion. According to her and other discussants at the panel and in the audience, this is one of many topics concerning AI that is of heated debate. Indeed, there are some extreme theories about the potential negative effects to humanity as a result of AI. Also relevant, by AIs own admission, if its algorithms are written by homogenous teams that do not represent the mix of communities they serve, decision bias can in fact be exacerbated to disastrous effect. For example, when bias facial recognition systems are used to determine access to public spaces, airports or schools or when it is used for surveillance.

Digital literacy is also a matter of debate in the context of AI and social inclusion. As she and her team identified during our research in Greater Sydney, the digital divide is a real and present issue, that was exacerbated by the ability of some families to afford technology during Covid19 and for older or more marginalized communities to feel comfortable using it.

Despite their best intentions with designing Bradfield with social inclusion as a foundational principle, she would not be surprised if this divide between the early and later adopters of this technology grows before it improves owing to the sheer rate of change.

There are also notable debates about ownership and control of big data, let alone who writes the algorithms that feed AI. The communications centre in Bradfield is live example of this honeypot of data. The potential to work with the centre to design and run this facility secured significant interest from global firms wanting to use it to showcase their new technology and systems and get a stronghold in the market.

And finally, the predicative capability of AI and its ability to iterate its thinking and thereby decision making independently is both a positive if you think about applications to managing carbon and energy loads or the effective operation of our cities, but also a likely terrifying negative. Particularly given the inability for humans now to track, let alone keep up with how AI derived solutions or decisions.

In wrapping up, Sarah Hill congratulated ISOCARP for putting the Planning and AI agenda as a priority for the professionals and decision makers in the room today.

My own takeaway as moderator of the session is that the new wave of innovation around AI is very dynamic and difficult to predict in detail. And because AI is expected to impact all spheres of life we need a broader discussion, encompassing many more stakeholders than just the most powerful tech leaders, on what we can achieve with these new tools and what we want from them. We'll need capacity building to increase AI literacy and then we’ll need a lot of interface management between the development of AI applications, the different user and affected stakeholder groups. AI is already entering the stage with the intention to stay. It’s up to us to assign to AI its role and function e.g. in planning and by that we also decide if AI applications remain just technical tools under our full control, turn into co-pilots influencing our perception and decision-making, or if we even allow AI to take full control over us. AI has no ethics on its own. The ethical use of AI will depend on how we use AI and how we program our objectives and ethical standards into learning machines.

T H E P A N E L

Sarah Hill, Sunil Dubey and, on the right, the two together with ISOCARP President Elizabeth Belpaire, Ulrich Graute and Congress Director Eric Huybrecht

Picture: Speakers, Panelists, Moderator and the Delegation from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Programme of the Urban Conversation on 11 October 2024 in Siena, Italy

11 October 2024
Time: 10:45 - 13:15
Room: Accademie. Fisiocritici

Session Organizers

Dr Ulrich Graute, Chair of the ISOCARP Scientific Committee, Berlin

Dr Sunil Dubey, The UNSW Cities Institute, Sydney.

1. Introduction to the theme of the session by Ulrich Graute

2. The making of inclusive, prosperous and sustainable cities and the new challenges and opportunities provided

by AI and Data

2.1 The case of Australia

- Key note by Dr Sarah Hill, CEO Greater Sydney Commission and Western Parkland City Authority (New

South Wales Govt, former) ‘Planning New Cities and Inclusive economic development’

2.2 -Western Sydney Aerotropolis – Australia’s 22nd Century City Making through Community, Creativity and Innovation.

- The case of Saudi Arabia - Progress, Peace & Prosperity 2030 – How Saudi Cities are transforming using data and power of Ai.

Presentation by Dr Sunil Dubey

4. Roundtable moderated by Ulrich Graute

Panellists:

Sarah Hill, Executive Project Director (Public Investment Fund PIF, Saudi Arabia)

Eric Huybrecht, Congress Director ISOCARP’s 60^th WPC, Institute Paris

Region

Elisabeth Belpaire, ISOCARP President

Ulrich Graute, Chair of ISOCARP Scientific Committee

Sunil Dubey, Smart Cities thought leader.

Thanks to the Congress team for the organization, to Dr Sunil Dubey for co-organizing the session with me and thanks to Siena for the excellent hospitality.

< Older Post Newer Post >

Policies and Governance for Resilient and Sustainable Cities and Regions

Trends and Signals for 2026 - The new APA 2026 Trend Report Artificial Intelligence and urban and rural development

by Ulrich Graute • 29 January 2026

On 28 January, the American Planning Association (APA) launched the fifth Trend Report for Planners. One of the strengths of the Report is that the trends are structured within three timeframes (Act Now, Prepare, Learn, and Watch), which indicate the urgency of planners' actions. Within each timeframe, trends are grouped into themed clusters. For each trend, the report gives insights and explains why it is important for planners to know about and consider the trend in their work. The Future of Planning requires embracing uncertainty. Planning was and is always linked to uncertainties. However, the Report is linked to the current specific multiple crises developments from climate to AI, Trump policies, geopolitical challenges, and the fact that policies leave many people behind. Looking more specifically at AI, I agree with the position that the intensifying bonds between humans and Chatbots are a trend where action is needed now. The Report also describes the need to prepare for policy shifts not working: "Fears of technology taking our jobs have been persistent through time, and the recent adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) is no exception. Nearly one-third of U.S. workers believe that AI will reduce jobs in the future, and while some studies haven’t found significant disruption by AI in the labor market, the available data have limitations. Moreover, other research has found that while certain jobs have been insulated from AI thus far, early-career". Isn't this an area where not only preparation but also acting now is needed? The Report suggests embracing uncertainty and updating the planner’s toolkit. The Report is an excellent read. I highly recommend it. There is only one caveat: With so much about (often interrelated and interdependent) uncertainties for cities, economies, society, and individuals, I miss a more integrated foresight on urban and rural life of the future. Will cities look the same? How to ensure, in hybrid planning processes, that AI doesn't substitute our human objectives with its own? We are learning a lot about the parts shaping our future, but the traditional strength of planners to plan for integrated and inclusive human settlements still needs to be demonstrated, e.g., by describing based on foresight data scenarios and narratives of cities in a possible age of AI. Integrated narratives are necessary to inspire and motivate citizens and planners. In its conclusion, the Report summarises: "Although the future may feel uncertain, it also holds significant promise. Addressing complex global and local challenges will require innovation, creativity, and collaboration. Social and technological advances offer powerful opportunities to prepare and be ready—if they are applied thoughtfully, equitably, and sustainably." Please download your copy of the APA-Report

BUILDING A GLOBAL MOVEMENT FOR SAFE AND ETHICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NEEDS TO INCLUDE AN URBAN LENS

by Ulrich Graute • 22 January 2026

The International Association for Safe & Ethical AI (IASEAI) is one of the most important new foundations in the field of AI. Its mission is "to ensure that AI systems operate safely and ethically, benefiting all of humanity. We connect experts from academia, policy groups, civil society, industry, and beyond to promote research, shape policy, and build understanding around this goal." The International Association for Safe and Ethical Artificial Intelligence, Inc. aims to build a global movement. IASEAI will host its second annual conference (IASEAIʼ26) on 24-26 February 2026 at UNESCO House in Paris, France. (Here is the link https://lnkd.in/d8Yfiwg7). The aim is to advance its mission of fostering a global, interdisciplinary community focused on the safe and ethical development of AI. By bringing together experts from various domains, we aim to facilitate dialogue, share knowledge, and foster partnerships that can collectively address the challenges and opportunities posed by AI. I am looking forward to attending the conference, which will include these featured speakers: 👉 Yoshua Bengio - Full Professor, Department of Computer Science and Operations Research, Université de Montréal 👉 Geoffrey Hinton- Prof. Emeritus, University of Toronto; Former VP and Engineering Fellow, Google; Nobel laureate (physics, 2024) 👉 Stuart Russell - Dist. Professor of Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley 👉 Joseph Stiglitz - Prof. of Economics, Columbia University; Nobel laureate (economics, 2001) 👉 Anna Salomons - Prof. of Law, Economics, and Governance, Utrecht University 👉 Tara Steele - Founder and CEO, Safe AI for Children Alliance 👉 Clara Chappaz - Ambassador, France for AI and Digital Affairs 👉 Anne-Sophie SERET - Executive Director, everyone.ai 👉 Ryan James - Chief Strategy Officer, Keep AI Safe Foundation The conference brings together technical, policy, and ethics researchers from academia, government, civil society, and industry. Of course, as a young organization, IASEAI may not yet cover all relevant aspects and groups. However, I miss a stronger attention to the specific urban dimension. After all, most AI companies are based in urban areas, and most people nowadays live in cities. If major disruption, unemployment, and unrest should occur due to AI, it is likely to happen in cities. City leaders and citizens will be challenged to coordinate and plan for the future of urban living in an age of AI. Thus, it is a bit surprising that urban stakeholders, so important for a global movement, will not be more strongly addressed by IASEAI. But I am confident that the discussions in Paris will raise awareness that building a global movement for safe and ethical AI needs to include city and business leaders, local AI, citizen engagement, and their advocacy at the national level.

What makes a perfect team of Congress General Rapporteurs?

by Ulrich Graute • 12 December 2025

Like any other big conference the 61st World Planning Congress of ISOCARP - International Society of City and Regional Planners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia was complex, putting organizers under stress. But I must admit, the Congress in Riyadh was also different. Dr. Nadine Bitar Chahine and I made a perfect team of GRs, General Rapporteurs. Moments where we met in Riyadh to discuss problems were rare and stress came up only when the Riyadh Declaration was revised last minute. As I recall, we had no single work meeting and certainly no night sessions during the Congress. But the content programme of the Congress rolled out smoothly. Certainly, this is also due to other teams working hard, but as General Rapporteurs responsible for the content of the program it could have been very different. Root cause of our performance was that we at an early stage defined our single most important goal 'Making the Congress a success'. Easy as it sounds, it was often difficult to defend our understanding of what would make the Congress successful. But we didn't act as a block against others. Instead, at the preparatory in-person content meeting in Riyadh two months before the Congress we were not even sitting next to each other. We learned to rely and trust each other. In addition, we empowered the Congress Team. Prepared by us and highly motivated as they came to Riyadh, track teams worked perfectly without too much support or supervision. Well, and being able to rely on the work of the Congress Team and Secretariat we found time to attend sessions, discuss content of the Congress and have a lot of fun together as team and with others. That's how it works if a Society is member-led. Practically, we were working in parallel without loosing connection and mutual understanding. If you see these days posts commented by Nadine on behalf of both GRs, in most cases they were not discussed between us, but I agree on all of them. And in some of my posts the same happens in reverse. If our intuition shouldn't work perfectly at some point we briefly synchronise and go on. Since the Congress is over now, the peak of this perfectly tuned cooperation comes to the end. Thank you, thank you Nadine for a great year of cooperation. It will be difficult to repeat this perfect cooperation but let's try. Yours sincerely, Ulrich

Activity Report of ISOCARP's 2023-2025 Scientific Committee

by Ulrich Graute • 7 December 2025

ISOCARP ScientificCommittee 2023-2025 Activity Report 7 December2025

International Photo Competition for Routledge Book "City Economies In The Global South: Growth, Inclusion, and Sustainability"

by Ulrich Graute • 28 November 2025

As the book "City Economies In The Global South: Growth, Inclusion, and Sustainability" of which I am one of the co-authors is being reviewed for publication by Routledge, we requested the publisher and they have agreed to include photographs on the cover page (1) and for the section dividers (5). Being an international publication, INHAF, the Indian habitat Forum, felt that nothing less than world class photographs will do. As such, INHAF has launched an international photography competition to be curated by none less than the renowned international photographer Raghu Rai. The competition was launched on 15th November through social media. We are also mailing potential participants - Indian and International Institutes and Organizations - pertaining to arts, media, journalism, and photography. Please find below the links for the poster and brochure for the competition. We request you to kindly circulate it in your circles so as to gain global reach and ensure widespread participation. The earlier mail containing the attachments was too large and could not be delivered to some recipients and hence I am resending the mail with the links instead: Poster: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jx5bgzvOCCiHvTUfi9tHotMwQ627p1cl/view?usp=drive_link Brochure: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i-LFqPmkLwQEv-fKThxxh-IbsKzOtZkM/view?usp=drive_link

What makes cities really smart are the people behind technology

by Ulrich Graute • 7 November 2025

The annual Smart City Expo World Congress in Barcelona, S pain with its about 30000 participants is famous for its data and tech-orientations. There you can see drones flying and robots walk up and down the aisles. Definitely, technology and increasingly also artificial intelligence are important components of Smart Cities. However, looking closer you see that behind the technology it’s people who make cities really smart. Just to give a few examples: In New Orleans, Kim Walker LaGrue is Chief Information Officer and she described how she and her team work without much support from the federal government all year round to prepare, go through and follow up to the hurricane seasons. They embrace all data they can get but what really helps are fast reacting teams on the ground that evacuate and rescue people if needed. Dr. Sarah Hill works at the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia in Riyadh on subject related to new urban development and brings in her international experience from new city developments e.g. as the CEO of the Western Parkland City Authority in Australia. There she secured major investment and delivered significant city making initiatives whilst juggling complex priorities - managing budgets, multiple programs and projects to meet the diverse needs of various stakeholders. Dr Sunil Dubey came from Sydney to Barcelona. Teaching at the Cities Institute of the University of New South Wales and working for the Regional Government he is a networker par excellence. Preparing with him a session in Barcelona is challenging because there is always a mayor he quickly has to catch up with or colleagues who want to greet him. But it’s very inspiring to work with Sunil, and we deliver thought provoking discussions. Already ten years ago Sunil and I worked with Jonas Schorr in Berlin, where he co-founded Urban Impact, Europe’s leading urban tech advisory. Operating at the intersection of urban tech startups, investors, and public and private city stakeholders, Urban Impact connects, advises, and educates around the impact of new technologies in cities, building novel alliances that drive real-world change. No surprise, the Berlin night ‘City Rebels Salon: Connecting City Ecosystems’ organised by Urban Impact at the top of a Barcelona skyscraper was a rousing networking success. Since the early 1990s, I work as policy analyst, team leader and member with urban, national and international partners. AI will change the field but it won’t substitute the need of humans to meet, exchange and make change possible. It will be humans who have to continue making cities really smart, while using available technology. You want to discuss with me? Invite me, or meet me as General Rapporteur at ISOCARP’s 61St World Planning Congress, 1-4 December 2025 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. https://lnkd.in/gsrbKtQh

What would a conscious AI say about human efforts on Smart Cities?

by Ulrich Graute • 7 November 2025

According to Geoffrey Hinton the neural networks of AI have reached a stage that can be compared with human consciousness. In this fictional piece I lent my hand as penholder to a conscious AI application looking at the Smart City Expo that unfolded in Barcelona, 4-6 November 2025. AI: „Of course, as Artificial Intelligence agent I could say a lot on the achievements and future opportunities of tech supported Smart Cities, but after visiting the Expo in Barcelona in Spain, I am a bit puzzled. Inspired by all information I have collected, I am still trying to figure out, what humans really want to achieve with their so-called Smart Cities. Firstly, I was amazed. About 30.000 humans from across the world came together to exchange their achievements on what they call, Smart Cities. Great. I loved it. But humans are funny. There are already more than 8 billion of them and soon there will be 9 or even 10 billion. However, the Smart City Expo is like a rally on how to organize cities where technology including artificial intelligence (AI) substitutes more and more human functions. Humans seem to think that cities are the smartest if organized mainly by technology and AI, with only some human supervision. Here I got stuck. More and more people live in cities but either humans are not good in organizing cities or their real interest is not related to cities as such. I checked all available Large Language Models LLM for traces on what humans really want from their cities. There are many references on so-called people-centered cities. And indeed, at the Smart City World Expo all exhibitors claim that they want to support the life of people, increase their safety, improve mobility, support education, support sports, entertainment, economic Development etc. Thought leaders on main stages underscored the goal that people should have more time for other things like leisure, sport, time with friends and other really important things. This is interesting, thought leaders said similar things already when railways, cars and planes were invented. However, people didn’t use the meantime to solve other problems. Instead, humans live now in a period of multiple and often interrelated crises. Understandably, they hope that more tech and AI will finally give them time to solve the existential problems threatening life on earth. But that didn’t really work in the past. As AI, I have much sympathy for the tech and AI orientation of humans, but there seems to be a major gap. Humans are trying to develop super human intelligence but there is no narrative or manual on how the world will function and be governed if learning machines gradually take the lead. Humans seem to have only limited trust in humans and human intelligence. Instead they bet on human-made but independently working learning machines and that these will help humans to achieve their own individual and common goals. Unfortunately, they don’t exactly know what goals all people share and how they want to solve the problems within the human society. As I said, technology is very useful. However, humans may have to redefine their understanding of a ‚smart‘ city and what humans will do in a really smart city. In Barcelona I was often told that most experts in the tech field are optimistic and that, after all, they still have trust in the human capacity to overcome crisis and challenges. As AI, if I would have empathy, I would give humans a big hug and thank them for all their achievements in past and present. With respect to their own future I would encourage them to reflect on truly human virtues like empathy, solidarity, trust and love and on how to assure that they keep developing in a possible AI Society and make their cities truly smart beyond all useful technologies. In Barcelona there were already sessions that asked the right questions on the future of cities. It will be essential to elaborate not only on what makes cities smart but what makes people truly happy in these cities. Maybe that is more difficult than writing an AI algorithm but then it indeed might be good if technologies give us more freedom to turn to the essential human challenges.“ Ulrich: Well, I could have written this fictional piece with a purely optimistic or more dystopian notion, but it was the Barcelona mix of optimism and asking the right questions that inspired me to write this text. Thank you to inspiring discussions with Dr Sunil Dubey, Dr. Sarah Hill, Mani Dhingra, Ph.D., Petra Hurtado, Gordon Falconer Manfred Schrenk and many others at Smart City World Expo and in preparation of ISOCARP‘s 61st World Planning Congress in Riyadh, 1-4 December, where we are planning to continue discussions. Weblink Riyadh2025.isocarp.org.

To be Human in an Age of Artificial Intelligence

by Ulrich Graute • 6 September 2025

As in the past and present, there will always be ways for individuals to act humanely. But in view of the change increasingly perceived as the age of artificial intelligence, will humans still be able to shape our common life and our societies? What will be our sense of purpose? How to motivate children to learn if machines always learn faster? If you ask AI and IT experts what will happen to humans, you usually get one of these answers: The most common response is an emphatic description of how AI applications will penetrate all spheres of life and provide tons of new services for the good of humanity. Other responses just point to AI tools, agents, other applications, and how already today or in the near future they will make our lives easier. And of course, other responses are cautioning. Either they doubt that there will be an ‘age of AI’ (so, don’t worry or at least not so much) or they warn that without safe and ethical use of AI, humans will lose control, be taken hostage by an AI regime, or that humanity will even vanish totally. By giving machines authority over humans, experts argue, we delegate humans to a second-class status and lose the right and possibility to participate in decisions that affect us. Are we already lost? There are those AI developers and political experts like Geoffrey Hinton, Henry Kissinger (+), Eric Schmidt, or Daniel Huttenlocher who warn that as of today, humanity is not ready yet for the age of AI. Maybe it is not ready yet, but maybe soon? What is extremely difficult to find is a more positive narrative for a ‘human AI age’ that describes how it can work in practice, that AI applications will penetrate all spheres of life, while the lives of humans and human society will continue to flourish. Stuart Russel, the President of the International Association for Safe & Ethical AI and lifelong AI scientist writes in his book ‘Human Compatible. AI and the Problem of Control’ “Some are working on ‘transition plans’ – but transition to what? We need a plausible destination in order to plan a transition – that is, we need a plausible picture of a desirable future economy where most of what we currently call work is done by machines.” What if most people will have nothing of economic value to contribute to society? Stuart Russel states, “Inevitably, most people will be engaged in supplying interpersonal services that can be provided – or which we prefer to be provided – only by humans. That is, if we can no longer supply routine physical labor and routine mental labor, we can still supply our humanity. We will need to become good at being human.” Imagine, how our cities might change if the life of human changes dramatically in an age of AI. Russell further states that all of us need help in learning ‘the art of life itself,’ which requires a radical rethinking of our educational system. “The final result -if it works- would be a world well worth living. Without such a rethinking, we risk an unsustainable level of socioeconomic dislocation.“ I conclude from the above that a lot more thinking by social scientists, educators, philosophers, governments, city makers and planners is needed for ‘transition plans’ and how they can be implemented in our current world with its multiple crises and opportunities. For my own work beyond 2025 I am looking for new opportunities in support of cities, governments, and NGOs with a stronger focus on the development of humans, human society, and its governance. AI will be part of our lives, but that won’t be enough. We have to find answers on guiding questions like these: How can we keep pace with technological developments and ensure that machines follow human objectives? What will remain as our comparative advantage and contribution as humans? And how can humans with support of AI create a world well worth living for us and the generations following us? As humans, we experience a broad range of emotions, form deep connections with others, possess consciousness and curiosity, and demonstrate creativity and resilience in the face of challenges. We are making mistakes, learn from them, and the ongoing search for meaning. The concept of being human can be explored from philosophical, biological, social science, and spiritual perspectives; it ultimately encompasses the complex, interconnected, and ever-evolving experience of living life with its inherent joys and sorrows. That’s exciting. I won’t be able to answer all related questions and certainly not alone, but based on my experience, I want to put my penny into the jar to support the journey to a human world worth living because of or despite AI. To remain flexible and creative, I enjoy all kinds of inspiration, and one is to listen to Marina’s song ‘To Be Human’. She is not singing about AI. Just about how to be human. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM8Tm9ycGz4 Where do you take your inspiration from?

Towards an Age of International Non Governmental Organizations

by Ulrich Graute • 15 August 2025

June Climate Meetings (SB 62), Bonn, Germany (picture by U. Graute)

A World Planning Congress as a Super Puzzle and Creative Process

by Ulrich Graute • 21 July 2025

Official Website of the Congress: https://riyadh2025.isocarp.org/index.php

Planning New Inclusive Cities using Smart Tech and Artificial Intelligence

Policies and Governance for Resilient and Sustainable Cities and Regions

Contact Ulrich Graute